MLA Annotated Bibliography: Heading and Page Setup
MLA does not use a title page for student papers. Your identifying information goes in the body of the document.
The Four Line MLA Heading
In the upper-left corner of the first page, on four separate double-spaced lines:
|
On the line immediately after the date, center the title of the document. For a standalone annotated bibliography, the title is Annotated Bibliography or Annotated List of Works Cited, both are acceptable under MLA 9. Do not bold, underline, or italicise it. Same font, same size as the rest of the document.
Page Numbers
Your last name and the page number go in the header, right-aligned, on every page, including the first: Smith 1, Smith 2, and so on. Set this through your word processor's header tool; do not type it manually on each page.
Page Setup Checklist
|
MLA 9 Annotated Bibliography: The Indentation Mistake That Costs Marks
MLA 9 uses two distinct indentation levels in an annotated bibliography. They apply to different parts of the entry. Mixing them up is the single most common formatting error professors flag.
Level 1: The Hanging Indent (Citation Line Only)
Every citation uses a hanging indent: the first line of the citation is flush with the left margin, and every subsequent line of that same citation is indented 0.5 inches.
This is identical to a standard MLA Works Cited hanging indent. It applies only to the citation, not to the annotation.
How to apply in Word: Select the citation text, go to Format, then Paragraph, under Indentation choose Special as Hanging, and set “By” to 0.5 inches. How to apply in Google Docs: Select the citation text, go to Format, then Align & indent, choose Indentation options, set Special indent to Hanging, and enter 0.5 inches. |
Level 2: The Annotation Indent (Annotation Paragraph Only)
The annotation paragraph is indented 1 inch from the left margin, not 0.5 inches.
This is the MLA 9 update that most guides, and most students, still get wrong. The 1-inch indent is specified in the MLA Handbook 9th edition, section 5.132, and confirmed in Purdue OWL's MLA 9 annotated bibliography guidance. The purpose is visual: the deeper indent makes it instantly clear that the annotation belongs to the citation above it, and is not a new entry starting.
How to apply in Word: Click into the annotation paragraph, go to the Layout tab, adjust Indent Left, and set it to 1 inch. How to apply in Google Docs: Select the annotation paragraph, go to Format, then Align & indent, open Indentation options, and set the Left indent to 1 inch. |
What the Two Levels Look Like Together
Orwell, George. "Politics and the English Language." Horizon,
vol. 13, no. 76, 1946, pp. 252–265. ? 0.5" hanging indent
In this essay, Orwell argues that vague political ? 1" annotation indent
Writing is both a symptom and a cause of muddled
thinking. [annotation continues at 1" throughout]
The visual gap between the 0.5" citation and the 1" annotation is what separates MLA 9 from earlier edition, and from APA, which uses 0.5" for both.
If your annotation runs to more than one paragraph, each additional paragraph starts at the 1-inch indent level. Indent the first line of each subsequent paragraph an additional 0.5 inches (so 1.5 inches from the left margin). Do not add a blank line between annotation paragraphs; double-spacing handles the separation.
How Long Should Each MLA Annotation Be?
MLA 9 does not mandate a fixed word count, but the working standard is 100–150 words per annotation. That is enough space to cover two things: what the source says, and why it matters for your project.
A well-constructed 100–150-word annotation typically contains:
|
If your professor specifies a word count, follow it exactly. If they say "one paragraph," 100–150 words is the reliable target. If they say nothing, write until you have covered both summary and evaluation clearly, then stop.
One important note: MLA 9 allows annotations to be written in complete sentences or in phrases, depending on what the professor requires. Complete sentences are the safe default unless you have been told otherwise. If you need to know the general length of an annotation, check the how long an annotated bibliography should be guide. |
MLA 9 Annotated Bibliography Citation Formats by Source Type
The citation portion of each entry is standard MLA 9 Works Cited format. Below are the four source types you are most likely to encounter, with a template and a real example for each.
Journal Article
Template:
Example:
|
No DOI da,tabase article: If the article has no DOI and you found it through a library database (JSTOR, EBSCO, ProQuest), do not include the database URL. The citation ends after the page range. If you found it directly on a website (not through a database), include the full URL at the end instead.
Book
Template:
Example:
|
Chapter in an Edited Book
Template:
Example:
|
Website or Webpage
Template:
Example:
|
The Citation Details Students Most Often Get Wrong
1. Two-author citations
The first author is reversed (Last, First). The second is not (First Last). Example: Dweck, Carol S., and Ellen L. Leggett.
2. Three or more authors
List only the first author, then write et al. Do not list all authors.
3. Article titles vs. container titles
Article, chapter, and webpage titles go in quotation marks. Journal, book, and website titles are italicised. Swapping these is one of the most common citation errors on student submissions.
4. Publisher location
MLA 9 removed the publisher city requirement. Do not write "New York:" before the publisher's name.
|
Accessed dates for websites: Optional in MLA 9. Include them only when the source has no publication date, or when the content is likely to change over time.
Getting the citation format right once is straightforward. Getting it right consistently across ten or twelve sources, different source types, different edge cases, and no errors your professor will flag, is where most students lose an hour. If you would rather hand that off, MLA bibliography help from a professional writer is available: tell us your sources and your deadline, and we handle every citation. |
MLA Annotated Bibliography: Alphabetical Order
Entries are listed alphabetically by the first element of the citation, almost always the author's last name.
Rules that trip students up:
- No author: Alphabetise by the first significant word of the title, ignoring A, An, and The. A source titled The Effects of Climate Change alphabetises under E.
- Same last name: Alphabetise by first name.
- Same author, multiple works: Alphabetise by the first significant word of each title among that author's works.
- Numbers: Treat as if written out. 7 Habits alphabetises under S for Seven.
These rules are identical in APA format. If your assignment turned out to use APA rather than MLA, the APA annotated bibliography guide covers every APA 7th edition formatting rule in the same depth as this page. |
Three Complete MLA 9 Annotated Bibliography Samples
Each entry below is formatted exactly as it would appear in your submitted document, with correct indentation levels, double-spacing, citation format, and a full annotation. Read the structural note under each one. It explains what each annotation is doing move by move, so you can replicate the approach for your own sources.
Sample 1: Journal Article
Dweck, Carol S., and Ellen L. Leggett. "A Social-Cognitive Approach to Motivation and Personality." Psychological Review, vol. 95, no. 2, 1988, pp. 256–73.
Dweck and Leggett propose a two-goal framework distinguishing between students who pursue learning goals, seeking to develop competence, and those who pursue performance goals, seeking to demonstrate competence relative to peers. Drawing on a series of experimental studies across age groups, they argue that goal orientation shapes how students respond to setback, effort, and challenge more reliably than baseline ability does. The framework has proven highly generative: it is the theoretical foundation for subsequent growth mindset research. Its key limitation for contemporary literature reviews is that some large-scale mindset intervention studies have struggled to replicate Dweck's original effect sizes, which means this source works best as a primary theoretical framework rather than as a basis for specific intervention claims.
What this annotation does
Sentence 1 names the source's argument. Sentence 2 covers methodology. Sentence 3 evaluates influence and quality. Sentence 4 names a real, specific limitation and tells the reader exactly how to use the source given that limitation.
That four-move structure, argument, method, evaluation, limitation with use-case, works for nearly any peer-reviewed article. The limitation sentence is what separates an evaluative annotation from a descriptive one; professors notice when every source is described as flawless.
Sample 2: Book
hooks, bell. Teaching to Transgress: Education as the Practice of Freedom. Routledge, 1994.
Drawing on her experience as both student and professor, hooks argues that genuine education requires critical engagement with power, race, and lived experience, not the passive transmission of information. She challenges the assumed neutrality of the classroom and proposes a pedagogy that treats learning as an act of freedom rather than conformity. The book is written with unusual candour and accessibility for an academic text, and is widely taught in education, cultural studies, and critical theory courses at the undergraduate and graduate level. For research on pedagogy and social justice in higher education, it provides both a theoretical argument and practical classroom application; it is particularly valuable for essays engaging with Paulo Freire's Pedagogy of the Oppressed, which hooks explicitly builds on and extends.
What this annotation does
Sentence 1 names the central argument. Sentence 2 extends the argument to its implications. Sentence 3 evaluates tone, credibility, and academic standing. Sentence 4 narrows the relevance; it tells a specific type of reader (someone doing social justice pedagogy research) exactly how to use this book and in relation to which other work.
That final contextualisation move is especially useful for books, where the source is often too broad to evaluate without specifying which part of it applies to which research context.
Sample 3: Website
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. "Mental Health, Data and Statistics." CDC, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2 Nov. 2023, www.cdc.gov/mentalhealth/data_stats/index.htm.
This CDC page aggregates national surveillance data on the prevalence of mental health conditions in the United States, depression, anxiety, and serious psychological distress, broken down across demographic groups including age, sex, race, and income level. The data draws from the National Health Interview Survey and Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, both large-scale, methodologically rigorous federal surveys conducted annually. As a government source updated each year, the page carries strong institutional authority and is appropriate for research requiring current population-level statistics. Its limitation is scope: it reports prevalence without exploring causal factors or intervention effectiveness. Use it as a data source to support broader empirical claims, not as a standalone analytical source.
What this annotation does
Website sources need authority evaluation more than any other source type, professors and readers are naturally sceptical, and establishing credibility before naming limitations is the right order. This annotation names the data sources (the surveys) before assessing institutional authority, then names the scope limitation, and closes with a direct instruction on how to use the source.
That final sentence, "Use it as a data source to support broader empirical claims, not as a standalone analytical source", is the most useful thing an annotation can tell a future reader. It removes ambiguity about the source's role in the bibliography.
If you want to see these same rules applied across more formats, Chicago, Harvard, Turabian, alongside MLA, the annotated bibliography examples page has finished entries in five styles with structural notes on each.
You have the format and three complete models. Writing the annotations for your own sources, reading each carefully, summarising accurately, and producing an honest evaluation, is where most students run out of time. If your deadline is closer than your schedule, CollegeEssay.org handles MLA formatting for the full bibliography: send us your sources, annotation type, course level, and deadline, and we return every citation and annotation correctly formatted and ready to submit. |
MLA Annotated Bibliography Formatting Mistakes That Cost Marks
These are the errors professors flag most often on MLA annotated bibliographies, all of them specific to this format and this document type.
1. Using 0.5 inches for the annotation indent instead of 1 inch. This is the most widespread mistake. The annotation sits at 1 inch. The citation hanging indent is 0.5 inches. They are not on the same level. Many older guides, and some word processor templates, still use 0.5 inches for everything, which was updated in MLA 9.
2. Writing the annotation flush left. The annotation is not at the left margin. Leaving it flush left makes it visually indistinguishable from the start of a new citation, which is confusing and incorrect. It should be indented 1 inch as a block.
3. Adding a blank line between the citation and the annotation. Double-spacing already creates visual separation. An extra blank line is an MLA formatting error. Set line spacing to double throughout and do not manually insert blank lines anywhere in the document.
4. Single-spacing the annotation. The annotation is part of the document and must be double-spaced, including within the annotation paragraph itself. Check paragraph settings, line spacing set to "single" in one paragraph overrides your document-level setting.
5. Italicising article titles or putting book titles in quotation marks. Article, chapter, and webpage titles go in quotation marks. Book, journal, and website titles are italicised. This is one of the most frequent citation errors, and one of the easiest to get right by checking the template above before you submit.
6. Alphabetising by first name. Entries are sorted by the author's last name, not their first. Jones, Maria comes before Smith, Aaron because J precedes S, the last name is the sort key, not the first.
7. Including the publisher city. MLA 9 removed the publisher location from book citations. Do not write New York: Penguin Books, just Penguin Books. The city is gone.
You have read every MLA 9 rule, seen the indentation mechanics applied in practice, and have three complete models to work from. If you need a blank MLA entry structure to fill in rather than a finished model, the annotated bibliography template page has pre-formatted versions for articles, books, chapters, and websites.
What is left for most students at this point is the execution, ten or fifteen sources, each needing a correctly formatted citation and a properly evaluated annotation, all due before Thursday. If the hours are not there, tell us your sources, your annotation type, your course level, and your deadline, and let our writers take it from here.
