This paper evaluates the potential benefits of Delta Airlines increasing its efforts to create a more diverse and inclusive organization. It outlines an action plan that includes initiatives such as recruiting from a wider range of sources, actively encouraging the promotion of underrepresented groups, and providing training on cultural competency and implicit bias. The paper argues that this diversity initiative is not only aligned with Delta's corporate objectives but also has the potential to positively affect its bottom line through increased employee engagement and satisfaction, customer loyalty, and potential increased revenues. Finally, the paper concludes that investing in diversity initiatives can have a positive effect on both Delta's short-term objectives and its long-term goals.

This paper explores Amazon's ethical management systems and their impact on the company's success. It outlines the policies, regulations, and standards that employees are expected to follow, as well as the legal department’s role in enforcing them. Additionally, the paper looks at Amazon’s marketing strategies, financial performance, logistics operations, IT architecture, and use of customer data. It also examines how Amazon’s ethical practices have allowed the company to become a leader in the retail industry, such as through their efficient supply chain and brand recognition. Finally, it concludes that by following ethical management systems, Amazon is able to maintain both its customers’ loyalty and overall success.

This paper discusses the events that led to the resignation of Uber CEO Travis Kalanick and the sexual harassment claims made by former engineer Susan Fowler. It examines Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and how it applies to Fowler's case, as well as reviews sources such as the EEOC Fact Sheet and articles from Quartz and HuffPost Impact. The paper also evaluates Uber's corporate culture and suggests five corrective actions the company can take to limit its liability and prevent future sexual harassment issues. Finally, it concludes that companies should create an environment where employees feel comfortable reporting misconduct so that appropriate action can be taken.

This paper reviews the article "Organizational Adaptation" by Sarta, Durand, and Vergne, published in the Journal of Management. The authors provide a comprehensive overview of organizational adaptation strategies and how organizations can use them to remain competitive in an ever-changing environment. Topics discussed include technological advancements, customer expectations, and political/economic developments. Furthermore, potential challenges associated with these strategies are also addressed. Finally, the paper provides a critical analysis of the article, along with recommendations for how organizations should approach these strategies in order to be successful. The review concludes that although organizational adaptation strategies can have many potential benefits, careful consideration and planning are necessary in order to avoid unintended consequences. Ultimately, this article serves as a valuable guide for executives considering any type of adaptation strategy and offers practical suggestions on how to successfully apply them for long-term success.

This paper examines the millennial generation's dominant work values and how they are demonstrated in my work. It reviews the common work values for millennials, including confidence, financial success, self-reliance, and team-oriented loyalty to self and relationships. The essay discusses why these values are essential and whether I hold them personally. It also examines why some values may not be held and what alternate values could be useful. Finally, it provides insight into how understanding the dominant work values of one's generation can provide invaluable insight into performance management, goal setting, and motivation. This paper demonstrates that understanding the unique needs of each generation is essential for successful workplaces.

This paper examines the ethical dilemma faced by tech's biggest companies, as reported in a recent New York Times article. It evaluates the competing interests of protecting shareholders and being transparent with the public and explores how a company should balance these interests. The paper then applies the FAIR test to assess whether management acted ethically or not. It concludes that while the company acted responsibly by considering all available data before taking action, its actions did not necessarily provide enough transparency or warning to investors or customers who could have been impacted. Overall, it is suggested that more could have been done in terms of providing insight into potential economic shifts.